Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Massey Ferguson 592
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 592
Row Crop
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 318 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 854
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 592
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85485 hp
59285 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 592 is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 592 higher · +83 ci (+35%)854235 ci
592318 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 592 is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
5924
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 592 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 592 higher · +2 (+20%)85410
59212
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 592 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
854 (A)592 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 854 | 592 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | A4.318 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 854+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 318ci | ▲ 592+83 ci · +35% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.5in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 592 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 85th percentile (318 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
A · 854B · 592Median Utility Tractor