Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs McCormick Intl C80
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl C80
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 854
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl C80
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1 hp (+1%)85485 hp
C8084 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; C80 is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ C80 higher · +9 ci (+4%)854235 ci
C80244 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; C80 is in the 68th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
C804
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; C80 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ C80 higher · +6 (+60%)85410
C8016
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; C80 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)C80 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl C80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 854 | C80 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl C80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84hp | ▲ 854+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 244ci | ▲ C80+9 ci · +4% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl C80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchromesh, Shuttle, Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl C80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,135lb | ▲ 854+2,225 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl C80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl C80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl C80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl C80 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 68th percentile (244 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,135 lb)
A · 854B · C80Median Utility Tractor