Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs McCormick Intl CX85
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CX85
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ApolloApollo 854
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX85
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1 hp (+1%)85485 hp
CX8584 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; CX85 is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
CX854
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; CX85 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ CX85 higher · +14 (+140%)85410
CX8524
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; CX85 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 854 higher · +2,048 lb (+25%)85410,360 lb
CX858,312 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
854 is in the 87th percentile; CX85 is in the 78th · 5,107 models
854 (A)CX85 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 854 | CX85 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84hp | ▲ 854+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 166in | ▲ 854+58 in · +35% |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 108in | ▲ 854+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,312lb | ▲ 854+2,048 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 78th percentile (8,312 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 95th percentile (224 in)B · 84th percentile (166 in)
A · 854B · CX85Median Utility Tractor