Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs McCormick Intl CX90
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CX90
Utility
- power
- 83 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ApolloApollo 854
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX90
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +2 hp (+2%)85485 hp
CX9083 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; CX90 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CX90 higher · +33 ci (+14%)854235 ci
CX90268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; CX90 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
CX904
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; CX90 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ CX90 higher · +14 (+140%)85410
CX9024
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; CX90 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
854 (A)CX90 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 854 | CX90 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 83hp | ▲ 854+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 268ci | ▲ CX90+33 ci · +14% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Power shuttle, Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 166in | ▲ 854+58 in · +35% |
| Width | 78.7in | 92.3in | ▲ CX90+13.6 in · +17% |
| Height | 110in | 108in | ▲ 854+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,466lb | ▲ 854+1,894 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 320/85R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 420/85R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl CX90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (83 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 79th percentile (8,466 lb)
A · 854B · CX90Median Utility Tractor