Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs McCormick Intl F85
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl F85
Agricultural
- power
- 82 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 30
ApolloApollo 854
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl F85
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +3 hp (+4%)85485 hp
F8582 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; F85 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F85 higher · +33 ci (+14%)854235 ci
F85268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; F85 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
F854
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; F85 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F85 higher · +20 (+200%)85410
F8530
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; F85 is in the 96th · 4,941 models
854 (A)F85 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 854 | F85 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 1104C-44 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 82hp | ▲ 854+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 268ci | ▲ F85+33 ci · +14% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Mechanical shuttle, power shuttle, two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 146in | ▲ 854+78 in · +53% |
| Width | 78.7in | 49in | ▲ 854+29.7 in · +61% |
| Height | 110in | 90in | ▲ 854+20 in · +22% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 5,766lb | ▲ 854+4,594 lb · +80% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl F85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS (Roll-Over Protection Structure), Cab available | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (82 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 96th percentile (30)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,766 lb)
A · 854B · F85Median Utility Tractor