Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs McCormick Intl X4.50
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X4.50
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 219 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 854
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X4.50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85485 hp
X4.5085 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; X4.50 is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 854 higher · +16 ci (+7%)854235 ci
X4.50219 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; X4.50 is in the 60th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
X4.504
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; X4.50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 854 higher · +3,320 lb (+47%)85410,360 lb
X4.507,040 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
854 is in the 87th percentile; X4.50 is in the 67th · 5,107 models
854 (A)X4.50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 854 | X4.50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Deutz | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | C4DT62 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 219ci | ▲ 854+16 ci · +7% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.8in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 170in | ▲ 854+54 in · +32% |
| Width | 78.7in | 69in | ▲ 854+9.7 in · +14% |
| Height | 110in | 102in | ▲ 854+8 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 7,040lb | ▲ 854+3,320 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X4.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 60th percentile (219 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 67th percentile (7,040 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 95th percentile (224 in)B · 86th percentile (170 in)
A · 854B · X4.50Median Utility Tractor