Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs McCormick Intl X5.20
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X5.20
Utility
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
ApolloApollo 854
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X5.20
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85485 hp
X5.2085 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; X5.20 is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 854 higher · +27 ci (+13%)854235 ci
X5.20208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; X5.20 is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
X5.204
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; X5.20 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ X5.20 higher · +26 (+260%)85410
X5.2036
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; X5.20 is in the 99th · 4,941 models
854 (A)X5.20 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 854 | X5.20 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 208ci | ▲ 854+27 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Xtrashift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 163in | ▲ 854+61 in · +37% |
| Width | 78.7in | 83.5in | ▲ X5.20+4.8 in · +6% |
| Height | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | McCormick Intl X5.20 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS / Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 99th percentile (36)
Length
median 137 inA · 95th percentile (224 in)B · 81st percentile (163 in)
A · 854B · X5.20Median Utility Tractor