Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs New Holland T4.85
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T4.85
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 854
vs
New HollandNew Holland T4.85
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1 hp (+1%)85485 hp
T4.8584 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; T4.85 is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 854 higher · +28 ci (+14%)854235 ci
T4.85207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; T4.85 is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
T4.854
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; T4.85 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T4.85 higher · +2 (+20%)85410
T4.8512
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; T4.85 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
854 (A)T4.85 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | New Holland | — |
| Model | 854 | T4.85 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | FPT | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | F5D | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84hp | ▲ 854+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 207ci | ▲ 854+28 ci · +14% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.7in | 75.7in | ▲ 854+3 in · +4% |
| Height | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T4.85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS/Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Width
median 66 inA · 79th percentile (78.7 in)B · 72nd percentile (75.7 in)
A · 854B · T4.85Median Utility Tractor