Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs New Holland T503 NC
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T503 NC
Sub-Compact
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 275 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 854
vs
New HollandNew Holland T503 NC
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85485 hp
T503 NC85 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; T503 NC is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T503 NC higher · +40 ci (+17%)854235 ci
T503 NC275 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; T503 NC is in the 80th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
T503 NC4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; T503 NC is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T503 NC higher · +2 (+20%)85410
T503 NC12
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; T503 NC is in the 50th · 4,941 models
854 (A)T503 NC (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | New Holland | — |
| Model | 854 | T503 NC | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Not recorded | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ T503 NC+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 275ci | ▲ T503 NC+40 ci · +17% |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | 12x12 w/ mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 101in | ▲ 854+9 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Cat II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 5,743lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | New Holland T503 NC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 80th percentile (275 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 87th percentile (110 in)B · 67th percentile (101 in)
A · 854B · T503 NCMedian Utility Tractor