Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Renault 90-32 MX
Image not recorded
RenaultModel B
Renault 90-32 MX
Utility
- power
- 83 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 854
vs
RenaultRenault 90-32 MX
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +2 hp (+2%)85485 hp
90-32 MX83 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 90-32 MX is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 90-32 MX higher · +19 ci (+8%)854235 ci
90-32 MX254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 90-32 MX is in the 72nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
90-32 MX4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 90-32 MX is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 90-32 MX higher · +2 (+20%)85410
90-32 MX12
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 90-32 MX is in the 50th · 4,941 models
854 (A)90-32 MX (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Renault 90-32 MX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Renault | — |
| Model | 854 | 90-32 MX | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Renault 90-32 MX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | MWM | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | D226-4 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 83hp | ▲ 854+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,350RPM | ▲ 90-32 MX+150 RPM · +7% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 254ci | ▲ 90-32 MX+19 ci · +8% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Renault 90-32 MX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Renault 90-32 MX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 160in | ▲ 854+64 in · +40% |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 98.4in | ▲ 854+11.6 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,159lb | ▲ 854+2,201 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Renault 90-32 MX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Renault 90-32 MX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Renault 90-32 MX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Renault 90-32 MX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (83 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 72nd percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 77th percentile (8,159 lb)
A · 854B · 90-32 MXMedian Utility Tractor