Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Steyr 9080M
Image not recorded
ApolloApollo 854
vs
SteyrSteyr 9080M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +3 hp (+4%)85485 hp
9080M82 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 9080M is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9080M higher · +33 ci (+14%)854235 ci
9080M268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 9080M is in the 76th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
9080M4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 9080M is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9080M higher · +22 (+220%)85410
9080M32
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 9080M is in the 97th · 4,941 models
854 (A)9080M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9080M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Steyr | — |
| Model | 854 | 9080M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9080M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Sisu | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 44DT | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 82hp | ▲ 854+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 9080M+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 268ci | ▲ 9080M+33 ci · +14% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9080M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9080M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 157in | ▲ 854+67 in · +43% |
| Width | 78.7in | 85.4in | ▲ 9080M+6.7 in · +9% |
| Height | 110in | 106in | ▲ 854+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,267lb | ▲ 854+2,093 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9080M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9080M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9080M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9080M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (82 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 76th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 77th percentile (8,267 lb)
A · 854B · 9080MMedian Utility Tractor