Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Steyr 9085MT
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr 9085MT
Utility
- power
- 85.5 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 854
vs
SteyrSteyr 9085MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9085MT higher · +0.5 hp (<1%)85485 hp
9085MT85.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 9085MT is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9085MT higher · +33 ci (+14%)854235 ci
9085MT268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 9085MT is in the 76th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
9085MT4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 9085MT is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9085MT higher · +6 (+60%)85410
9085MT16
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 9085MT is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)9085MT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Steyr | — |
| Model | 854 | 9085MT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Sisu | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85.5hp | ▲ 9085MT+0.5 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 9085MT+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 268ci | ▲ 9085MT+33 ci · +14% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 166in | ▲ 854+58 in · +35% |
| Width | 78.7in | 85.4in | ▲ 9085MT+6.7 in · +9% |
| Height | 110in | 108in | ▲ 854+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 9,215lb | ▲ 854+1,145 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Steyr 9085MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 76th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 83rd percentile (9,215 lb)
A · 854B · 9085MTMedian Utility Tractor