Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs UTB/Universal 850
Image not recorded
UTB/UniversalModel B
UTB/Universal 850
Agricultural
- power
- 83 hp
- displacement
- 285 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 854
vs
UTB/UniversalUTB/Universal 850
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +2 hp (+2%)85485 hp
85083 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 850 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 850 higher · +50 ci (+21%)854235 ci
850285 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 850 is in the 83rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 850 higher · +2 (+50%)8544
8506
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 850 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 850 higher · +6 (+60%)85410
85016
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 850 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)850 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | UTB/Universal | — |
| Model | 854 | 850 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | UTB | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | D2601.000 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 83hp | ▲ 854+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 850+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 850+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 235ci | 285ci | ▲ 850+50 ci · +21% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partially synchronized, Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 163in | ▲ 854+61 in · +37% |
| Width | 78.7in | 80in | ▲ 850+1.3 in · +2% |
| Height | 110in | 108in | ▲ 854+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 9,000lb | ▲ 854+1,360 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540/1000 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | UTB/Universal 850 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (83 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 83rd percentile (285 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 82nd percentile (9,000 lb)
A · 854B · 850Median Utility Tractor