Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Zetor 8020
Image not recorded
ApolloApollo 854
vs
ZetorZetor 8020
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +3 hp (+4%)85485 hp
802082 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 8020 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8020 higher · +19 ci (+8%)854235 ci
8020254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 8020 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
80204
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 8020 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8020 higher · +2 (+20%)85410
802012
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 8020 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
854 (A)8020 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Zetor | — |
| Model | 854 | 8020 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Zetor | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 82hp | ▲ 854+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 254ci | ▲ 8020+19 ci · +8% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 152in | ▲ 854+72 in · +47% |
| Width | 78.7in | 73in | ▲ 854+5.7 in · +8% |
| Height | 110in | 105in | ▲ 854+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 7,040lb | ▲ 854+3,320 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Zetor 8020 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (82 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 73rd percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 67th percentile (7,040 lb)
A · 854B · 8020Median Utility Tractor