Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Bobcat CT225
Image not recorded
BobcatModel B
Bobcat CT225
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 85.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
BobcatBobcat CT225
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 300 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)30027.5 hp
CT22527 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; CT225 is in the 51st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +9.8 ci (+11%)30095.2 ci
CT22585.4 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; CT225 is in the 46th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ CT225 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
CT2253
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; CT225 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 300 higher · +779 lb (+26%)3003,800 lb
CT2253,021 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
300 is in the 73rd percentile; CT225 is in the 57th · 711 models
300 (A)CT225 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Bobcat | — |
| Model | 300 | CT225 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Daedong | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27hp | ▲ 300+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ CT225+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 85.4ci | ▲ 300+9.8 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 55.5in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 95.7in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 3,021lb | ▲ 300+779 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Live (Rear) and Optional (Middle) | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,225lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Bobcat CT225 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 46th percentile (85.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 57th percentile (3,021 lb)
A · 300B · CT225Median Sub-Compact Tractor