Head to head · Sub-Compact

Ascot Universal 300 vs Cub Cadet 7275

Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A

Ascot Universal 300

Sub-Compact

power
27.5 hp
displacement
95.2 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
9
Full 300 specs
Cub Cadet 7275 Tractor
Cub CadetModel B

Cub Cadet 7275

Utility

power
27 hp
displacement
91.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 7275 specs
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7275

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 711–816

Engine Power

▲ 300 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)
30027.5 hp
727527 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

300 is in the 51st percentile; 7275 is in the 51st · 816 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 300 higher · +3.9 ci (+4%)
30095.2 ci
727591.3 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci

300 is in the 55th percentile; 7275 is in the 49th · 757 models

Cylinders

▲ 7275 higher · +1 (+50%)
3002
72753
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3

300 is in the 11th percentile; 7275 is in the 50th · 802 models

Operating Weight

▲ 300 higher · +1,115 lb (+42%)
3003,800 lb
72752,685 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb

300 is in the 73rd percentile; 7275 is in the 50th · 711 models

300 (A)7275 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
ManufacturerAscot UniversalCub Cadet—
Model3007275—
CategorySub-CompactUtility—

Engine

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
ManufacturerUTBMitsubishi—
ModelNot recordedK3M—
Power Output27.5hp27hp▲ 300+0.5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,400RPM2,500RPM▲ 7275+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders23▲ 7275+1 · +50%
Displacement95.2ci91.3ci▲ 300+3.9 ci · +4%
Bore3.7in3.3in▲ 300+0.4 in · +12%
Stroke4.3in3.5in▲ 300+0.8 in · +23%

Transmission

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
TypeConstant MeshHydrostatic—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
LengthNot recorded115in—
WidthNot recorded54in—
HeightNot recorded84.3in—
Operating Weight3,800lb2,685lb▲ 300+1,115 lb · +42%

Hydraulics

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic PowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchRear Type I—
Hitch CategoryII/II—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type2WD4WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic PowerSame

Electrical

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
CoolantNot recorded1.7gal—

Operator Station

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet 7275Difference
TypeNot recordedWith ROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 91.4 ci
A · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 49th percentile (91.3 ci)

Cylinders

median 3
A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 2,700 lb
A · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 50th percentile (2,685 lb)
A · 300B · 7275Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageAscot Universal 300Full spec pageCub Cadet 7275