Head to head · Sub-Compact

Ascot Universal 300 vs Cub Cadet GTX 1054

Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A

Ascot Universal 300

Sub-Compact

power
27.5 hp
displacement
95.2 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
9
Full 300 specs
Cub Cadet GTX 1054 Tractor
Cub CadetModel B

Cub Cadet GTX 1054

Lawn and Garden

power
27 hp
displacement
44.2 ci
Cylinders
2
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full GTX 1054 specs
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet GTX 1054

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 711–816

Engine Power

▲ 300 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)
30027.5 hp
GTX 105427 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

300 is in the 51st percentile; GTX 1054 is in the 51st · 816 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 300 higher · +51 ci (+115%)
30095.2 ci
GTX 105444.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci

300 is in the 55th percentile; GTX 1054 is in the 6th · 757 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
3002
GTX 10542
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3

300 is in the 11th percentile; GTX 1054 is in the 11th · 802 models

Operating Weight

▲ 300 higher · +3,214 lb (+548%)
3003,800 lb
GTX 1054586 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb

300 is in the 73rd percentile; GTX 1054 is in the 1st · 711 models

300 (A)GTX 1054 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
ManufacturerAscot UniversalCub Cadet—
Model300GTX 1054—
CategorySub-CompactLawn and Garden—

Engine

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
ManufacturerUTBKohler—
ModelNot recordedCourage SV740—
Power Output27.5hp27hp▲ 300+0.5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,400RPM3,600RPM▲ GTX 1054+1,200 RPM · +50%
Cylinders22Same
Displacement95.2ci44.2ci▲ 300+51 ci · +115%
Bore3.7in3.3in▲ 300+0.4 in · +12%
Stroke4.3in2.6in▲ 300+1.7 in · +65%

Transmission

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
TypeConstant MeshHydrostatic—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
LengthNot recorded67.7in—
Operating Weight3,800lb586lb▲ 300+3,214 lb · +548%

Hydraulics

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
System TypeOpen CenterNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerManual sector and pinion—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent with electric clutch—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryII/INot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerManual sector and pinion—

Electrical

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecAscot Universal 300Cub Cadet GTX 1054Difference
TypeNot recordedOpen operator station—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 91.4 ci
A · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 6th percentile (44.2 ci)

Cylinders

median 3
A · 11th percentile (2)B · 11th percentile (2)

Operating Weight

median 2,700 lb
A · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 1st percentile (586 lb)
A · 300B · GTX 1054Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageAscot Universal 300Full spec pageCub Cadet GTX 1054