Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Fendt Dieselross F28
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt Dieselross F28
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 144 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 5
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
FendtFendt Dieselross F28
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ Dieselross F28 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)30027.5 hp
Dieselross F2828 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; Dieselross F28 is in the 53rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Dieselross F28 higher · +48.8 ci (+51%)30095.2 ci
Dieselross F28144 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; Dieselross F28 is in the 81st · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied3002
Dieselross F282
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; Dieselross F28 is in the 11th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 300 higher · +4 (+80%)3009
Dieselross F285
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; Dieselross F28 is in the 4th · 616 models
300 (A)Dieselross F28 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Fendt Dieselross F28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Fendt | — |
| Model | 300 | Dieselross F28 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Fendt Dieselross F28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | MWM | — |
| Model | Not recorded | KDW415Z | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 28hp | ▲ Dieselross F28+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 144ci | ▲ Dieselross F28+48.8 ci · +51% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.9in | ▲ Dieselross F28+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5.9in | ▲ Dieselross F28+1.6 in · +37% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Fendt Dieselross F28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Fendt Dieselross F28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Fendt Dieselross F28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Fendt Dieselross F28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Fendt Dieselross F28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Fendt Dieselross F28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 53rd percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 81st percentile (144 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 11th percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 4th percentile (5)
A · 300B · Dieselross F28Median Sub-Compact Tractor