Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Ford 1710
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
FordFord 1710
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 1710 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)30027.5 hp
171027.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; 1710 is in the 51st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +10 ci (+12%)30095.2 ci
171085.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; 1710 is in the 46th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 1710 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
17103
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; 1710 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1710 higher · +3 (+33%)3009
171012
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; 1710 is in the 73rd · 616 models
300 (A)1710 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Ford | — |
| Model | 300 | 1710 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | H843 | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27.7hp | ▲ 1710+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1710+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ 1710+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 85.2ci | ▲ 300+10 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.3in | ▲ 300+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.3in | ▲ 300+1 in · +30% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | 12x4 Synchro Diesel 12-speed | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 54.7in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 84.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 2,425lb | ▲ 300+1,375 lb · +57% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear, Transmission PTO with optional front PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,813lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical drum | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ford 1710 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 46th percentile (85.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 73rd percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 44th percentile (2,425 lb)
A · 300B · 1710Median Sub-Compact Tractor