Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs McCormick Intl CT28
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CT28
Utility
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 91.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT28
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ CT28 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)30027.5 hp
CT2828 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; CT28 is in the 53rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +3.7 ci (+4%)30095.2 ci
CT2891.5 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; CT28 is in the 51st · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ CT28 higher · +2 (+100%)3002
CT284
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; CT28 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ CT28 higher · +3 (+33%)3009
CT2812
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; CT28 is in the 73rd · 616 models
300 (A)CT28 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 300 | CT28 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Mitsubishi | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 28hp | ▲ CT28+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ CT28+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ CT28+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 91.5ci | ▲ 300+3.7 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.1in | ▲ 300+0.6 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.1in | ▲ 300+1.2 in · +39% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 66.5in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 89.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 2,645lb | ▲ 300+1,155 lb · +44% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 53rd percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 51st percentile (91.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 73rd percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 49th percentile (2,645 lb)
A · 300B · CT28Median Sub-Compact Tractor