Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs McCormick Intl CTJ27
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CTJ27
Utility
- power
- 27 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CTJ27
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 300 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)30027.5 hp
CTJ2727 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; CTJ27 is in the 51st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +14.8 ci (+18%)30095.2 ci
CTJ2780.4 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; CTJ27 is in the 40th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ CTJ27 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
CTJ273
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; CTJ27 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 300 higher · +2,191 lb (+136%)3003,800 lb
CTJ271,609 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
300 is in the 73rd percentile; CTJ27 is in the 28th · 711 models
300 (A)CTJ27 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 300 | CTJ27 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27hp | ▲ 300+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ CTJ27+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ CTJ27+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 80.4ci | ▲ 300+14.8 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.1in | ▲ 300+0.6 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.6in | ▲ 300+0.7 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 103in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 46in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 85in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 1,609lb | ▲ 300+2,191 lb · +136% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 23x8.50-12 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 12x16.5 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl CTJ27 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier III | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 40th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 28th percentile (1,609 lb)
A · 300B · CTJ27Median Sub-Compact Tractor