Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs McCormick Intl X10.30H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.30H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 85 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.30H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ X10.30H higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)30027.5 hp
X10.30H28 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; X10.30H is in the 53rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +10.2 ci (+12%)30095.2 ci
X10.30H85 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; X10.30H is in the 45th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ X10.30H higher · +1 (+50%)3002
X10.30H3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; X10.30H is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 300 higher · +683 lb (+22%)3003,800 lb
X10.30H3,117 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
300 is in the 73rd percentile; X10.30H is in the 59th · 711 models
300 (A)X10.30H (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 300 | X10.30H | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3A139 | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 28hp | ▲ X10.30H+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ X10.30H+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ X10.30H+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 85ci | ▲ 300+10.2 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.2in | ▲ 300+0.6 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.6in | ▲ 300+0.7 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 54.6in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 96.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 3,117lb | ▲ 300+683 lb · +22% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 53rd percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 45th percentile (85 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 59th percentile (3,117 lb)
A · 300B · X10.30HMedian Sub-Compact Tractor