Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Mitsubishi MT28
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT28
Utility
- power
- 27.6 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT28
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ MT28 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)30027.5 hp
MT2827.6 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; MT28 is in the 51st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +14.8 ci (+18%)30095.2 ci
MT2880.4 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; MT28 is in the 40th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ MT28 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
MT283
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; MT28 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 300 higher · +1 (+13%)3009
MT288
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; MT28 is in the 40th · 616 models
300 (A)MT28 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 300 | MT28 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27.6hp | ▲ MT28+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ MT28+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ MT28+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 80.4ci | ▲ 300+14.8 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.1in | ▲ 300+0.6 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.6in | ▲ 300+0.7 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 126in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 55.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 93.9in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 2,579lb | ▲ 300+1,221 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear Type: I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT28 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 40th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 40th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 47th percentile (2,579 lb)
A · 300B · MT28Median Sub-Compact Tractor