Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Mitsubishi MT280D
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT280D
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 78.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT280D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ MT280D higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)30027.5 hp
MT280D28 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; MT280D is in the 53rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +16.5 ci (+21%)30095.2 ci
MT280D78.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; MT280D is in the 38th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ MT280D higher · +1 (+50%)3002
MT280D3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; MT280D is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied3009
MT280D9
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; MT280D is in the 50th · 616 models
300 (A)MT280D (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT280D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 300 | MT280D | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT280D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Not recorded | K3H | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 28hp | ▲ MT280D+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ MT280D+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ MT280D+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 78.7ci | ▲ 300+16.5 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.1in | ▲ 300+0.6 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.5in | ▲ 300+0.8 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT280D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT280D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT280D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT280D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT280D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Mitsubishi MT280D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 53rd percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 38th percentile (78.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (9)
A · 300B · MT280DMedian Sub-Compact Tractor