Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs New Holland 1630
New HollandModel B
New Holland 1630
Utility
- power
- 27.3 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
New HollandNew Holland 1630
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 300 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)30027.5 hp
163027.3 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; 1630 is in the 51st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +14 ci (+17%)30095.2 ci
163081.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; 1630 is in the 42nd · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 1630 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
16303
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; 1630 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied3009
16309
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; 1630 is in the 50th · 616 models
300 (A)1630 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | New Holland | — |
| Model | 300 | 1630 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27.3hp | ▲ 300+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1630+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ 1630+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 81.2ci | ▲ 300+14 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 54.3in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 87.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 2,474lb | ▲ 300+1,326 lb · +54% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Middle PTO: Live (hydro), Rear PTO: Continuous live | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,920lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | New Holland 1630 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post fixed ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 42nd percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 46th percentile (2,474 lb)
A · 300B · 1630Median Sub-Compact Tractor