Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Ursus C-350
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
UrsusUrsus C-350
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ C-350 higher · +22.5 hp (+82%)30027.5 hp
C-35050 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; C-350 is in the 90th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ C-350 higher · +94.8 ci (+100%)30095.2 ci
C-350190 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; C-350 is in the 95th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ C-350 higher · +2 (+100%)3002
C-3504
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; C-350 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ C-350 higher · +1 (+11%)3009
C-35010
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
300 is in the 50th percentile; C-350 is in the 62nd · 616 models
300 (A)C-350 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Ursus | — |
| Model | 300 | C-350 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Ursus | — |
| Model | Not recorded | S-4001 | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 50hp | ▲ C-350+22.5 hp · +82% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 300+400 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ C-350+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 190ci | ▲ C-350+94.8 ci · +100% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.7in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 4,829lb | ▲ C-350+1,029 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Ursus C-350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 90th percentile (50 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 95th percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 50th percentile (9)B · 62nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 91st percentile (4,829 lb)
A · 300B · C-350Median Sub-Compact Tractor