Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Yanmar FV-270
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FV-270
Utility
- power
- 27.1 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
YanmarYanmar FV-270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ 300 higher · +0.4 hp (+1%)30027.5 hp
FV-27027.1 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; FV-270 is in the 51st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 300 higher · +3.9 ci (+4%)30095.2 ci
FV-27091.3 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
300 is in the 55th percentile; FV-270 is in the 49th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ FV-270 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
FV-2703
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; FV-270 is in the 50th · 802 models
300 (A)FV-270 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 300 | FV-270 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Yanmar | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 27.1hp | ▲ 300+0.4 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ FV-270+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ FV-270+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | 91.3ci | ▲ 300+3.9 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.3in | ▲ 300+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.5in | ▲ 300+0.8 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Four-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar FV-270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 51st percentile (27.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 55th percentile (95.2 ci)B · 49th percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
A · 300B · FV-270Median Sub-Compact Tractor