Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 300
Sub-Compact
- power
- 27.5 hp
- displacement
- 95.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Ascot Universal 300 vs Yanmar YM2820
YanmarModel B
Yanmar YM2820
Utility
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 300
vs
YanmarYanmar YM2820
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ YM2820 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)30027.5 hp
YM282028 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
300 is in the 51st percentile; YM2820 is in the 53rd · 816 models
Cylinders
▲ YM2820 higher · +1 (+50%)3002
YM28203
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
300 is in the 11th percentile; YM2820 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ YM2820 higher · +25 lb (<1%)3003,800 lb
YM28203,825 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
300 is in the 73rd percentile; YM2820 is in the 75th · 711 models
300 (A)YM2820 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar YM2820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 300 | YM2820 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar YM2820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Yanmar | — |
| Power Output | 27.5hp | 28hp | ▲ YM2820+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ YM2820+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.2ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar YM2820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant Mesh | Power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar YM2820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 125in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 58in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 75in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,800lb | 3,825lb | ▲ YM2820+25 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar YM2820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar YM2820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar YM2820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 300 | Yanmar YM2820 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 51st percentile (27.5 hp)B · 53rd percentile (28 hp)
Cylinders
median 3A · 11th percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 73rd percentile (3,800 lb)B · 75th percentile (3,825 lb)
A · 300B · YM2820Median Sub-Compact Tractor