Image not recorded
Ascot UniversalModel A
Ascot Universal 445
Utility
- power
- 45 hp
- displacement
- 143 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Ascot Universal 445 vs Challenger MT295
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT295
Utility
- power
- 44.2 hp
- displacement
- 134 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Ascot UniversalAscot Universal 445
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT295
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 445 higher · +0.8 hp (+2%)44545 hp
MT29544.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
445 is in the 39th percentile; MT295 is in the 38th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 445 higher · +9 ci (+7%)445143 ci
MT295134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
445 is in the 36th percentile; MT295 is in the 32nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT295 higher · +1 (+33%)4453
MT2954
Median Utility Tractor4
445 is in the 23rd percentile; MT295 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT295 higher · +10 (+167%)4456
MT29516
Median Utility Tractor12
445 is in the 11th percentile; MT295 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
445 (A)MT295 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ascot Universal | Challenger | — |
| Model | 445 | MT295 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | UTB | Iseki | — |
| Model | D-115 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 45hp | 44.2hp | ▲ 445+0.8 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ MT295+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT295+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 143ci | 134ci | ▲ 445+9 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.4in | ▲ 445+0.3 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.6in | ▲ 445+0.7 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | 141in | ▲ MT295+20 in · +17% |
| Width | Not recorded | 71.5in | — |
| Height | 58.7in | 95.9in | ▲ MT295+37.2 in · +63% |
| Operating Weight | 4,500lb | 4,277lb | ▲ 445+223 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.5-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6-28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I,II | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,600lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 (2WD) | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ascot Universal 445 | Challenger MT295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 39th percentile (45 hp)B · 38th percentile (44.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 36th percentile (143 ci)B · 32nd percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 43rd percentile (4,500 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,277 lb)
A · 445B · MT295Median Utility Tractor