Image not recorded
BarreirosModel A
Barreiros 70.7
Utility
- power
- 64 hp
- displacement
- 217 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Agricultural
How they compare
70.7 is in the 57th percentile; 3220 is in the 57th · 5,383 models
70.7 is in the 59th percentile; 3220 is in the 44th · 5,580 models
70.7 is in the 50th percentile; 3220 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
70.7 is in the 23rd percentile; 3220 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | Massey Ferguson 3220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Barreiros | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 70.7 | 3220 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | Massey Ferguson 3220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Barreiros | Perkins | — |
| Model | DH34 | 903.27T | — |
| Power Output | 64hp | 64hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 70.7+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 217ci | 165ci | ▲ 70.7+52 ci · +32% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | Massey Ferguson 3220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Partially synchronized | — |
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | Massey Ferguson 3220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 5,450lb | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | Massey Ferguson 3220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | Massey Ferguson 3220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | Massey Ferguson 3220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | Massey Ferguson 3220 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context