Image not recorded
BarreirosModel A
Barreiros 70.7
Utility
- power
- 64 hp
- displacement
- 217 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Barreiros 70.7 vs SAME Tiger 65
SAMEModel B
SAME Tiger 65
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 183 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BarreirosBarreiros 70.7
vs
SAMESAME Tiger 65
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 70.7 higher · +2 hp (+3%)70.764 hp
Tiger 6562 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
70.7 is in the 57th percentile; Tiger 65 is in the 56th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 70.7 higher · +34 ci (+19%)70.7217 ci
Tiger 65183 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
70.7 is in the 59th percentile; Tiger 65 is in the 50th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 70.7 higher · +1 (+33%)70.74
Tiger 653
Median Utility Tractor4
70.7 is in the 50th percentile; Tiger 65 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Tiger 65 higher · +4 (+50%)70.78
Tiger 6512
Median Utility Tractor12
70.7 is in the 23rd percentile; Tiger 65 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
70.7 (A)Tiger 65 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Barreiros | SAME | — |
| Model | 70.7 | Tiger 65 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Barreiros | SAME | — |
| Model | DH34 | 1000.3 | — |
| Power Output | 64hp | 62hp | ▲ 70.7+2 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 70.7+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 217ci | 183ci | ▲ 70.7+34 ci · +19% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 131in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 77.5in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 60.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,450lb | 4,762lb | ▲ 70.7+688 lb · +14% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Barreiros 70.7 | SAME Tiger 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 57th percentile (64 hp)B · 56th percentile (62 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 59th percentile (217 ci)B · 50th percentile (183 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,450 lb)B · 45th percentile (4,762 lb)
A · 70.7B · Tiger 65Median Utility Tractor