Image not recorded
BarreirosModel A
Barreiros R-545
Utility
- power
- 77 hp
- displacement
- 414 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
Head to head · Utility
Utility

Utility
How they compare
R-545 is in the 69th percentile; 6410 Mark III is in the 71st · 5,383 models
R-545 is in the 91st percentile; 6410 Mark III is in the 75th · 5,580 models
R-545 is in the 50th percentile; 6410 Mark III is in the 50th · 5,720 models
R-545 is in the 6th percentile; 6410 Mark III is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Barreiros R-545 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Barreiros | Ford | — |
| Model | R-545 | 6410 Mark III | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
| Spec | Barreiros R-545 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Barreiros | Ford | — |
| Model | BL24 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 77hp | 80hp | ▲ 6410 Mark III+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,070RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 414ci | 268ci | ▲ R-545+146 ci · +54% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Spec | Barreiros R-545 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Barreiros R-545 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 116in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 106in | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,720lb | 7,540lb | ▲ R-545+180 lb · +2% |
| Spec | Barreiros R-545 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Barreiros R-545 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Spec | Barreiros R-545 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Barreiros R-545 | Ford 6410 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context