BelarusModel A
Belarus 1005
Row Crop
- power
- 100 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
Belarus 1005 vs CaseIH Farmall 100C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 100C
Row Crop
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 1005
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 100C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 1005 higher · +1 hp (+1%)1005100 hp
Farmall 100C99 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
1005 is in the 25th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 24th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1005 higher · +83 ci (+40%)1005290 ci
Farmall 100C207 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1005 is in the 29th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 10th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10054
Farmall 100C4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1005 is in the 17th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1005 higher · +6 (+50%)100518
Farmall 100C12
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1005 is in the 61st percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 27th · 1,200 models
1005 (A)Farmall 100C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 1005 | Farmall 100C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 100hp | 99hp | ▲ 1005+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 207ci | ▲ 1005+83 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 1005+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 1005+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 163in | Same |
| Width | 78in | 75.7in | ▲ 1005+2.3 in · +3% |
| Height | 113in | 107in | ▲ 1005+6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 8,874lb | 6,989lb | ▲ 1005+1,885 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | SCR and Cooled EGR | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 1005 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 25th percentile (100 hp)B · 24th percentile (99 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 29th percentile (290 ci)B · 10th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 25th percentile (8,874 lb)B · 15th percentile (6,989 lb)
A · 1005B · Farmall 100CMedian Row Crop Tractor