BelarusModel A
Belarus 1025
Row Crop
- power
- 100 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
Belarus 1025 vs McCormick Intl X50.40m
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.40m
Utility
- power
- 102 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 1025
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.40m
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ X50.40m higher · +2 hp (+2%)1025100 hp
X50.40m102 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
1025 is in the 25th percentile; X50.40m is in the 26th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1025 higher · +82 ci (+39%)1025290 ci
X50.40m208 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1025 is in the 29th percentile; X50.40m is in the 10th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied10254
X50.40m4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1025 is in the 17th percentile; X50.40m is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1025 higher · +6 (+50%)102518
X50.40m12
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1025 is in the 61st percentile; X50.40m is in the 27th · 1,200 models
1025 (A)X50.40m (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 1025 | X50.40m | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 100hp | 102hp | ▲ X50.40m+2 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ X50.40m+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 208ci | ▲ 1025+82 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 1025+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 1025+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-Speed | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 163in | ▲ 1025+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 78in | 81.2in | ▲ X50.40m+3.2 in · +4% |
| Height | 113in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,144lb | 7,590lb | ▲ 1025+1,554 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 12.4-24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1025 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 25th percentile (100 hp)B · 26th percentile (102 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 29th percentile (290 ci)B · 10th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 27th percentile (9,144 lb)B · 18th percentile (7,590 lb)
A · 1025B · X50.40mMedian Row Crop Tractor