Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 1052
Utility
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1052 vs Challenger MT525B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525B
Agricultural
- power
- 104 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 1052
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1052 higher · +1 hp (<1%)1052105 hp
MT525B104 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1052 is in the 85th percentile; MT525B is in the 84th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525B higher · +112 ci (+39%)1052290 ci
MT525B402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1052 is in the 83rd percentile; MT525B is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT525B higher · +2 (+50%)10524
MT525B6
Median Utility Tractor4
1052 is in the 50th percentile; MT525B is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT525B higher · +7,991 lb (+111%)10527,209 lb
MT525B15,200 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1052 is in the 69th percentile; MT525B is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
1052 (A)MT525B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Challenger | — |
| Model | 1052 | MT525B | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Perkins Diesel | — |
| Model | D240 | U092650K | — |
| Power Output | 105hp | 104hp | ▲ 1052+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT525B+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 402ci | ▲ MT525B+112 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ 1052+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 5in | ▲ MT525B+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 169in | ▲ MT525B+17 in · +11% |
| Width | 77.6in | 81.1in | ▲ MT525B+3.5 in · +5% |
| Height | 114in | 113in | ▲ 1052+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 7,209lb | 15,200lb | ▲ MT525B+7,991 lb · +111% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | — |
Tires
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 18.4R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II/III | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 2/3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Two-Wheel Drive | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | Challenger MT525B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 85th percentile (105 hp)B · 84th percentile (104 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (290 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 69th percentile (7,209 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,200 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 67th percentile (152 in)B · 85th percentile (169 in)
A · 1052B · MT525BMedian Utility Tractor