Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 1052
Utility
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1052 vs IMT 5100
Image not recorded
BelarusBelarus 1052
vs
IMTIMT 5100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied1052105 hp
5100105 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1052 is in the 85th percentile; 5100 is in the 85th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5100 higher · +64 ci (+22%)1052290 ci
5100354 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1052 is in the 83rd percentile; 5100 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 5100 higher · +2 (+50%)10524
51006
Median Utility Tractor4
1052 is in the 50th percentile; 5100 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1052 higher · +8 (+80%)105218
510010
Median Utility Tractor12
1052 is in the 83rd percentile; 5100 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
1052 (A)5100 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | IMT | — |
| Model | 1052 | 5100 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | IMT | — |
| Model | D240 | IMR S 46/T | — |
| Power Output | 105hp | 105hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 5100+50 RPM · +2% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 5100+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 354ci | ▲ 5100+64 ci · +22% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 1052+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 5in | ▲ 5100+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 190in | ▲ 5100+38 in · +25% |
| Width | 77.6in | 86.7in | ▲ 5100+9.1 in · +12% |
| Height | 114in | 113in | ▲ 1052+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 7,209lb | 13,230lb | ▲ 5100+6,021 lb · +84% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | IMT 5100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 85th percentile (105 hp)B · 85th percentile (105 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (290 ci)B · 86th percentile (354 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 69th percentile (7,209 lb)B · 92nd percentile (13,230 lb)
A · 1052B · 5100Median Utility Tractor