Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 1052
Utility
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 1052 vs New Holland 8340
New HollandModel B
New Holland 8340
Row Crop
- power
- 106 hp
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 1052
vs
New HollandNew Holland 8340
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 8340 higher · +1 hp (<1%)1052105 hp
8340106 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1052 is in the 85th percentile; 8340 is in the 86th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8340 higher · +166 ci (+57%)1052290 ci
8340456 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1052 is in the 83rd percentile; 8340 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 8340 higher · +2 (+50%)10524
83406
Median Utility Tractor4
1052 is in the 50th percentile; 8340 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1052 higher · +6 (+50%)105218
834012
Median Utility Tractor12
1052 is in the 83rd percentile; 8340 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
1052 (A)8340 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | New Holland | — |
| Model | 1052 | 8340 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Ford | — |
| Model | D240 | Genesis | — |
| Power Output | 105hp | 106hp | ▲ 8340+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 1052+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 8340+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 456ci | ▲ 8340+166 ci · +57% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 8340+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 5in | ▲ 8340+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | SynchroShift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 176in | ▲ 8340+24 in · +16% |
| Width | 77.6in | 82.7in | ▲ 8340+5.1 in · +7% |
| Height | 114in | 110in | ▲ 1052+4 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 7,209lb | 8,684lb | ▲ 8340+1,475 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Gear pump (SL) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 1052 | New Holland 8340 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 85th percentile (105 hp)B · 86th percentile (106 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (290 ci)B · 93rd percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 69th percentile (7,209 lb)B · 80th percentile (8,684 lb)
A · 1052B · 8340Median Utility Tractor