BelarusModel A
Belarus 2011
Utility
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 69.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 2011 vs Challenger MT225B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT225B
Utility
- power
- 22.5 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 2011
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT225B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT225B higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)201122 hp
MT225B22.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2011 is in the 11th percentile; MT225B is in the 12th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2011 higher · +1.4 ci (+2%)201169.9 ci
MT225B68.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2011 is in the 10th percentile; MT225B is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT225B higher · +1 (+50%)20112
MT225B3
Median Utility Tractor4
2011 is in the 3rd percentile; MT225B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2011 higher · +993 lb (+62%)20112,602 lb
MT225B1,609 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
2011 is in the 18th percentile; MT225B is in the 7th · 5,107 models
2011 (A)MT225B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Challenger | — |
| Model | 2011 | MT225B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Slavia | Iseki | — |
| Model | 2S90A | E3312 | — |
| Power Output | 22hp | 22.5hp | ▲ MT225B+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 2011+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ MT225B+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 69.9ci | 68.5ci | ▲ 2011+1.4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.1in | ▲ 2011+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 3.1in | ▲ 2011+0.4 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 102in | ▲ 2011+4 in · +4% |
| Width | 48.4in | 39.4in | ▲ 2011+9 in · +23% |
| Height | 80.7in | 65.5in | ▲ 2011+15.2 in · +23% |
| Operating Weight | 2,602lb | 1,609lb | ▲ 2011+993 lb · +62% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 591lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Challenger MT225B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 11th percentile (22 hp)B · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.9 ci)B · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,602 lb)B · 7th percentile (1,609 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (106 in)B · 10th percentile (102 in)
A · 2011B · MT225BMedian Utility Tractor