BelarusModel A
Belarus 2011
Utility
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 69.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 2011 vs Cub Cadet LT 1022
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet LT 1022
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 22 hp
- displacement
- 40 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 2011
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet LT 1022
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied201122 hp
LT 102222 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
2011 is in the 11th percentile; LT 1022 is in the 11th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2011 higher · +29.9 ci (+75%)201169.9 ci
LT 102240 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
2011 is in the 10th percentile; LT 1022 is in the 1st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied20112
LT 10222
Median Utility Tractor4
2011 is in the 3rd percentile; LT 1022 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2011 higher · +2,095 lb (+413%)20112,602 lb
LT 1022507 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
2011 is in the 18th percentile; LT 1022 is in the 1st · 5,107 models
2011 (A)LT 1022 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | 2011 | LT 1022 | — |
| Category | Utility | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Slavia | Briggs & Stratton | — |
| Model | 2S90A | 40H777 | — |
| Power Output | 22hp | 22hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,600RPM | ▲ LT 1022+600 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 2 | Same |
| Displacement | 69.9ci | 40ci | ▲ 2011+29.9 ci · +75% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3in | ▲ 2011+0.5 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 2.9in | ▲ 2011+0.6 in · +21% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Belt-driven hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 67.7in | ▲ 2011+38.3 in · +57% |
| Width | 48.4in | 48.8in | ▲ LT 1022+0.4 in · <1% |
| Height | 80.7in | 42.9in | ▲ 2011+37.8 in · +88% |
| Operating Weight | 2,602lb | 507lb | ▲ 2011+2,095 lb · +413% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with electric clutch | — |
Tires
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 15x6-6 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20x9-8 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Dry disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 2011 | Cub Cadet LT 1022 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 11th percentile (22 hp)B · 11th percentile (22 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.9 ci)B · 1st percentile (40 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 18th percentile (2,602 lb)B · 1st percentile (507 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (106 in)B · 1st percentile (67.7 in)
A · 2011B · LT 1022Median Utility Tractor