Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 87 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Belarus 254 vs Cub Cadet LT1050
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet LT1050
Lawn and Garden
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 44.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 254
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet LT1050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ LT1050 higher · +1 hp (+4%)25425 hp
LT105026 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
254 is in the 46th percentile; LT1050 is in the 49th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +42.8 ci (+97%)25487 ci
LT105044.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
254 is in the 46th percentile; LT1050 is in the 6th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 254 higher · +1 (+50%)2543
LT10502
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
254 is in the 50th percentile; LT1050 is in the 11th · 802 models
254 (A)LT1050 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | 254 | LT1050 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Kohler | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Command CV730 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ LT1050+1 hp · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 254+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 87ci | 44.2ci | ▲ 254+42.8 ci · +97% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 2.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 68.1in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 54in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 42.9in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 525lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with Electric Clutch | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Dry Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 254 | Cub Cadet LT1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open Operator Station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 49th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 46th percentile (87 ci)B · 6th percentile (44.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 11th percentile (2)
A · 254B · LT1050Median Sub-Compact Tractor