Image not recorded
BelarusModel A
Belarus 254
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 87 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Belarus 254 vs New Holland 1530
New HollandModel B
New Holland 1530
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BelarusBelarus 254
vs
New HollandNew Holland 1530
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
153025 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
254 is in the 46th percentile; 1530 is in the 46th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +5.8 ci (+7%)25487 ci
153081.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
254 is in the 46th percentile; 1530 is in the 42nd · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
15303
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
254 is in the 50th percentile; 1530 is in the 50th · 802 models
254 (A)1530 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | New Holland | — |
| Model | 254 | 1530 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,600RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 87ci | 81.2ci | ▲ 254+5.8 ci · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 53.9in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 87.8in | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,920lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 254 | New Holland 1530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Two-post fixed ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 46th percentile (87 ci)B · 42nd percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
A · 254B · 1530Median Sub-Compact Tractor