Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 406 vs John Deere 210C
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 210C
Specialized
- power
- 58 hp
- displacement
- 239 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
BelarusBelarus 406
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 210C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied40658 hp
210C58 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
406 is in the 52nd percentile; 210C is in the 52nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 406 higher · +14 ci (+6%)406253 ci
210C239 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
406 is in the 71st percentile; 210C is in the 66th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4064
210C4
Median Utility Tractor4
406 is in the 50th percentile; 210C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 406 higher · +7 (+175%)40611
210C4
Median Utility Tractor12
406 is in the 41st percentile; 210C is in the 4th · 4,941 models
406 (A)210C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | John Deere | — |
| Model | 406 | 210C | — |
| Category | Utility | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | John Deere | — |
| Model | D144 (Belarus) | 4-239D | — |
| Power Output | 58hp | 58hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 210C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 253ci | 239ci | ▲ 406+14 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 210C+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.3in | ▲ 406+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 276in | ▲ 210C+121 in · +78% |
| Width | Not recorded | 74.8in | — |
| Height | 106in | 101in | ▲ 406+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 7,056lb | 10,494lb | ▲ 210C+3,438 lb · +49% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus 406 | John Deere 210C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Four-post ROPS/FOPS or Cab (optional) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (58 hp)B · 52nd percentile (58 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 71st percentile (253 ci)B · 66th percentile (239 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 41st percentile (11)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 68th percentile (7,056 lb)B · 87th percentile (10,494 lb)
A · 406B · 210CMedian Utility Tractor