Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 406 vs Massey Ferguson 1759
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1759
Utility
- power
- 59 hp
- displacement
- 135 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 406
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1759
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1759 higher · +1 hp (+2%)40658 hp
175959 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
406 is in the 52nd percentile; 1759 is in the 53rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 406 higher · +118 ci (+87%)406253 ci
1759135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
406 is in the 71st percentile; 1759 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4064
17594
Median Utility Tractor4
406 is in the 50th percentile; 1759 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1759 higher · +1 (+9%)40611
175912
Median Utility Tractor12
406 is in the 41st percentile; 1759 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
406 (A)1759 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 406 | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 406 | 1759 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 406 | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | D144 (Belarus) | K39 | — |
| Power Output | 58hp | 59hp | ▲ 1759+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 1759+400 RPM · +19% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 253ci | 135ci | ▲ 406+118 ci · +87% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.4in | ▲ 406+0.7 in · +21% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 3.7in | ▲ 406+1 in · +27% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 406 | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 406 | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 135in | ▲ 406+20 in · +15% |
| Width | Not recorded | 71.1in | — |
| Height | 106in | 93.3in | ▲ 406+12.7 in · +14% |
| Operating Weight | 7,056lb | 4,343lb | ▲ 406+2,713 lb · +62% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 406 | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 406 | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,307lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 406 | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Internal wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 406 | Massey Ferguson 1759 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 52nd percentile (58 hp)B · 53rd percentile (59 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 71st percentile (253 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 41st percentile (11)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 68th percentile (7,056 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,343 lb)
A · 406B · 1759Median Utility Tractor