Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 500 vs Massey Ferguson 690
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 690
Utility
- power
- 65.7 hp
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 500
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 690
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 690 higher · +0.7 hp (+1%)50065 hp
69065.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
500 is in the 59th percentile; 690 is in the 59th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 500 higher · +42 ci (+17%)500290 ci
690248 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
500 is in the 83rd percentile; 690 is in the 70th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied5004
6904
Median Utility Tractor4
500 is in the 50th percentile; 690 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 690 higher · +3 (+33%)5009
69012
Median Utility Tractor12
500 is in the 35th percentile; 690 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
500 (A)690 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 500 | 690 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | AD4.248 | — |
| Power Output | 65hp | 65.7hp | ▲ 690+0.7 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 690+400 RPM · +22% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 248ci | ▲ 500+42 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4in | ▲ 500+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 5in | ▲ 690+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 154in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,100lb | 8,020lb | ▲ 690+1,920 lb · +31% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Hydraulic control system direct engine drive | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 500 | Massey Ferguson 690 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 59th percentile (65 hp)B · 59th percentile (65.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (290 ci)B · 70th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,100 lb)B · 75th percentile (8,020 lb)
A · 500B · 690Median Utility Tractor