BelarusModel A
Belarus 592 MIG
Utility
- power
- 70 hp
- displacement
- 290 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 592 MIG vs New Holland T5040
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T5040
Utility
- power
- 73.2 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
BelarusBelarus 592 MIG
vs
New HollandNew Holland T5040
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T5040 higher · +3.2 hp (+5%)592 MIG70 hp
T504073.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
592 MIG is in the 63rd percentile; T5040 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 592 MIG higher · +16 ci (+6%)592 MIG290 ci
T5040274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
592 MIG is in the 84th percentile; T5040 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied592 MIG4
T50404
Median Utility Tractor4
592 MIG is in the 50th percentile; T5040 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T5040 higher · +3 (+33%)592 MIG9
T504012
Median Utility Tractor12
592 MIG is in the 35th percentile; T5040 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
592 MIG (A)T5040 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | New Holland | — |
| Model | 592 MIG | T5040 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CNH Diesel | — |
| Model | D-242c | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 70hp | 73.2hp | ▲ T5040+3.2 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ T5040+500 RPM · +28% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 290ci | 274ci | ▲ 592 MIG+16 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Selective gear fixed ratio | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 155in | 172in | ▲ T5040+17 in · +11% |
| Width | 77.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 109in | ▲ 592 MIG+1 in · <1% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 92.2in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,378lb | 8,390lb | ▲ T5040+12 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 73.2hp | — |
Tires
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 10:00-16 (2WD), 480/65R24 (FWA) | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 600/65R34 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 2WD / FWA | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD / FWA | — |
| Steering Type | Power | hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 592 MIG | New Holland T5040 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 63rd percentile (70 hp)B · 66th percentile (73.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (290 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 78th percentile (8,378 lb)B · 78th percentile (8,390 lb)
A · 592 MIGB · T5040Median Utility Tractor