Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Belarus 820 vs Ebro 684E
Image not recorded
BelarusBelarus 820
vs
EbroEbro 684E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 820 higher · +3 hp (+4%)82085 hp
684E82 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
820 is in the 75th percentile; 684E is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 684E higher · +15 ci (+5%)820290 ci
684E305 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
820 is in the 83rd percentile; 684E is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 684E higher · +2 (+50%)8204
684E6
Median Utility Tractor4
820 is in the 50th percentile; 684E is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 820 higher · +12 (+200%)82018
684E6
Median Utility Tractor12
820 is in the 83rd percentile; 684E is in the 11th · 4,941 models
820 (A)684E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Ebro | — |
| Model | 820 | 684E | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Perkins | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 82hp | ▲ 820+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 820+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 684E+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 290ci | 305ci | ▲ 684E+15 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.6in | ▲ 820+0.7 in · +19% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 5in | ▲ 684E+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 136in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 66.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,150lb | 6,790lb | ▲ 820+360 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.50x16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 15x30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus 820 | Ebro 684E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5.3gal | 4.5gal | ▲ 820+0.8 gal · +18% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (82 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (290 ci)B · 85th percentile (305 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 68th percentile (7,150 lb)B · 65th percentile (6,790 lb)
A · 820B · 684EMedian Utility Tractor