BelarusModel A
Belarus MTZ-102
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 293 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Belarus MTZ-102 vs Hesston 980
Image not recorded
HesstonModel B
Hesston 980
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 316 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
BelarusBelarus MTZ-102
vs
HesstonHesston 980
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 980 higher · +23 ci (+8%)MTZ-102293 ci
980316 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MTZ-102 is in the 84th percentile; 980 is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 980 higher · +2 (+50%)MTZ-1024
9806
Median Utility Tractor4
MTZ-102 is in the 50th percentile; 980 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MTZ-102 higher · +8 (+50%)MTZ-10224
98016
Median Utility Tractor12
MTZ-102 is in the 92nd percentile; 980 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MTZ-102 higher · +329 lb (+4%)MTZ-1028,580 lb
9808,251 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MTZ-102 is in the 79th percentile; 980 is in the 77th · 5,107 models
MTZ-102 (A)980 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Hesston | — |
| Model | MTZ-102 | 980 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | Fiat | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 8065 | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 980+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 980+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 293ci | 316ci | ▲ 980+23 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ MTZ-102+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ MTZ-102+0.6 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 162in | 152in | ▲ MTZ-102+10 in · +7% |
| Width | 77.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,580lb | 8,251lb | ▲ MTZ-102+329 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-102 | Hesston 980 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab & Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (293 ci)B · 85th percentile (316 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 79th percentile (8,580 lb)B · 77th percentile (8,251 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 79th percentile (162 in)B · 68th percentile (152 in)
A · MTZ-102B · 980Median Utility Tractor