BelarusModel A
Belarus MTZ-142
Agricultural
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Belarus MTZ-142 vs CaseIH Puma 145
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 145
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
BelarusBelarus MTZ-142
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MTZ-142 higher · +4 hp (+3%)MTZ-142150 hp
Puma 145146 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MTZ-142 is in the 69th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 67th · 1,028 models
MTZ-142 (A)Puma 145 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | MTZ-142 | Puma 145 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 146hp | ▲ MTZ-142+4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 6 | — |
| Displacement | Not recorded | 411ci | — |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 61.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 14,350lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 69th percentile (150 hp)B · 67th percentile (146 hp)
A · MTZ-142B · Puma 145Median Agricultural Tractor