
BelarusModel A
Belarus MTZ-142
Agricultural
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural

Agricultural

Row Crop
How they compare
MTZ-142 is in the 69th percentile; Puma 150 X is in the 69th · 1,028 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | CaseIH | — |
| Model | MTZ-142 | Puma 150 X | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Belarus | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 150hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | Not recorded | 6 | — |
| Displacement | Not recorded | 411ci | — |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Partial power shift | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Pressure Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Spec | Belarus MTZ-142 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context