BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1021
Utility
- power
- 21.1 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Tractor comparison: Utility
Bobcat CT1021 vs Farmall 140
Image not recorded
FarmallModel B
Farmall 140
Utility
- power
- 21.1 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT1021
vs
FarmallFarmall 140
Main specifications
Main specifications and the Utility category median
Engine Power
= EqualCT102121.1 hp
14021.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1021 is in the 10th percentile and 140 is in the 10th percentile (5,383 models in the category).
Engine Displacement
▲ 140 is higher by 53.9 ci (+78%)CT102169.1 ci
140123 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1021 is in the 10th percentile and 140 is in the 30th percentile (5,580 models in the category).
Cylinders
▲ 140 is higher by 1 (+33%)CT10213
1404
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1021 is in the 23rd percentile and 140 is in the 50th percentile (5,720 models in the category).
Operating Weight
▲ 140 is higher by 1,512 lb (+102%)CT10211,488 lb
1403,000 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1021 is in the 5th percentile and 140 is in the 23rd percentile (5,107 models in the category).
CT1021 (A)140 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
All specifications
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Farmall | — |
| Model | CT1021 | 140 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | International Harvester | — |
| Model | S733L | C-123 | — |
| Power Output | 21.1hp | 21.1hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 1,400RPM | ▲ CT1021+1,600 RPM · +114% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 140+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 123ci | ▲ 140+53.9 ci · +78% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ 140+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 4in | ▲ 140+0.8 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Sliding Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 107in | ▲ 140+7.7 in · +8% |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | 83in | ▲ CT1021+4.6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 3,000lb | ▲ 140+1,512 lb · +102% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | IH Fast Hitch (one-point) | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential Contracting Band | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open | — |
Category ranking
Category percentiles
Engine Power
median 55 hpA: 10th percentile (21.1 hp)B: 10th percentile (21.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA: 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B: 30th percentile (123 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A: 23rd percentile (3)B: 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA: 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B: 23rd percentile (3,000 lb)
Length
median 137 inA: 8th percentile (99.3 in)B: 14th percentile (107 in)
A: CT1021B: 140Median Utility Tractor