BobcatModel A
Bobcat CT1021
Utility
- power
- 21.1 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Bobcat CT1021 vs Farmall 140
Image not recorded
FarmallModel B
Farmall 140
Utility
- power
- 21.1 hp
- displacement
- 123 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
BobcatBobcat CT1021
vs
FarmallFarmall 140
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCT102121.1 hp
14021.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CT1021 is in the 10th percentile; 140 is in the 10th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 140 higher · +53.9 ci (+78%)CT102169.1 ci
140123 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CT1021 is in the 10th percentile; 140 is in the 30th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 140 higher · +1 (+33%)CT10213
1404
Median Utility Tractor4
CT1021 is in the 23rd percentile; 140 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 140 higher · +1,512 lb (+102%)CT10211,488 lb
1403,000 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CT1021 is in the 5th percentile; 140 is in the 23rd · 5,107 models
CT1021 (A)140 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Bobcat | Farmall | — |
| Model | CT1021 | 140 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | International Harvester | — |
| Model | S733L | C-123 | — |
| Power Output | 21.1hp | 21.1hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 1,400RPM | ▲ CT1021+1,600 RPM · +114% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 140+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 69.1ci | 123ci | ▲ 140+53.9 ci · +78% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ 140+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 4in | ▲ 140+0.8 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Sliding Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 99.3in | 107in | ▲ 140+7.7 in · +8% |
| Width | 46in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.6in | 83in | ▲ CT1021+4.6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 1,488lb | 3,000lb | ▲ 140+1,512 lb · +102% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | IH Fast Hitch (one-point) | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential Contracting Band | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Bobcat CT1021 | Farmall 140 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 10th percentile (21.1 hp)B · 10th percentile (21.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)B · 30th percentile (123 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,000 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 8th percentile (99.3 in)B · 14th percentile (107 in)
A · CT1021B · 140Median Utility Tractor